{"id":2809,"date":"2017-03-19T15:43:07","date_gmt":"2017-03-19T15:43:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jamiebrightmore.com\/?p=2809"},"modified":"2017-11-29T11:03:54","modified_gmt":"2017-11-29T11:03:54","slug":"sunday-times-ripped-off-work-refusing-license","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jamiebrightmore.com\/filmmaking\/sunday-times-ripped-off-work-refusing-license\/","title":{"rendered":"The Sunday Times ripped-off my creative work despite being asked to license it first"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

UPDATED<\/h3>\n

Please note, I’ve added more information below<\/a>. This is still unresolved. Please re-share this article, thanks.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

A couple of days ago I received an email from a journalist working on behalf of The Sunday Times.<\/p>\n

“Hi Jamie, I’m a journalist with Storyful.<\/p>\n

One of our clients, The Times, are doing a package on Bristol and were wondering if they could please use some of your videos as part of it?<\/p>\n

Anything used would be credited to you. The package would only be used on Facebook and Twitter on the Sunday Times accounts.<\/p>\n

Please let us know if you would be happy with this use.<\/p>\n

Thanks a lot”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

“Hi Louise,<\/p>\n

Thanks for getting in touch. I license my work for cases like this.<\/p>\n

Please have a look through my library and let me know if you’re still interested.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Then she replied…<\/p>\n

“Hi Jamie, thanks so much for the swift response.<\/p>\n

I’m afraid there is no budget for the package as it isn’t commercial. No ads will be featured on it or anything like that.<\/p>\n

The content owner will just be credited on screen.<\/p>\n

I completely understand if you would prefer not to allow your content to be included.<\/p>\n

Please just let us know. Thanks a lot”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

and my response:<\/p>\n

“Okay, I’d consider a charity \/ good cause but no feature by a major brand, etc. without payment. Sorry.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

…<\/p>\n

“No worries at all Jamie, thanks for considering it.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Today, The Times<\/strong> and The Sunday Times<\/strong> published this film linked below on Facebook which is nearing 500,000<\/del>\u00a01.2 million views.<\/p>\n

UPDATE 21.03.2017<\/strong>: Facebook finally removed the video<\/a>, over 48 hours after I reported the copyright violation. It had racked-up over 1.5 million views. I’ve uploaded a copy of the video below and it’s still available on Twitter<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n\t \t

Visit Bristol<\/h2>\n

The vast majority of the shots contained within this film are mine \/ my copyright and have seemingly been ripped from a film I produced for Visit Bristol<\/a>\u00a0(shown below).<\/p>\n

\n\t \t